On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:28:00PM +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: >Josh Boyer wrote: >>> One of my new packages got pulled in like that too >>> (mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc10.noarch), even though I have a F-11 branch >>> and I have built it for both F-11 and devel in koji. I have also >>> requested the package to be added to Fedora 11 updates in Bodhi, but for >>> some reason it still pulled in .fc10 package instead of the correct .fc11. >>> >> >> F11 Updates doesn't do inheritence to rawhide, since all of those are in >> 'pending' state. >> >> However, if you would like those new packages in rawhide instead of via >> updates you can file a ticket with rel-eng to get them included in >> dist-f11. >> > >I don't really care if my new packages are included in dist-f11 or if >they come in via updates. However, I surely don't want .fc10 versions in >dist-f11, so they should be either completely removed or updated to >.fc11 versions. > >Do you think the .fc10 packages that have crept in during this freeze >will be removed from rawhide all together, or should every maintainer >file a separate ticket with rel-eng for every package to get them >updated to proper .fc11 versions? That's a good question. I'll wait for Jesse to wake up and read this so we can discuss it. Stay tuned. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
