Re: Mono and pkg-config files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/477308
> 
> gtk-sharp2 pulls in a set of -devel packages due to the new pkgconfig
> dependencies in Fedora >= 11.
> 
> Does Mono need the pkgconfig .pc files at run-time?
> 
I know of no case that mono needs the .pc files at run-time.

The bug report you have linked reminds me of similar discussions we had
when the mono packaging guidelines were being drafted.  It was thought
at that time that creating a -devel package for a single .pc file was
preferable to dragging a bunch of -devel packages onto an end-user's box
that just needs runtime support.

You can point people at:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#-devel_packages

If people would like to get the Mono Guidelines changed to address
issues like this, we're definitely open to having more sensible
Guidelines.  However, they'd have to address the underlying issues (in
this case, that the pkgconfig files are dragging in other -devel packages).

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux