Michael Schwendt wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/477308 > > gtk-sharp2 pulls in a set of -devel packages due to the new pkgconfig > dependencies in Fedora >= 11. > > Does Mono need the pkgconfig .pc files at run-time? > I know of no case that mono needs the .pc files at run-time. The bug report you have linked reminds me of similar discussions we had when the mono packaging guidelines were being drafted. It was thought at that time that creating a -devel package for a single .pc file was preferable to dragging a bunch of -devel packages onto an end-user's box that just needs runtime support. You can point people at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#-devel_packages If people would like to get the Mono Guidelines changed to address issues like this, we're definitely open to having more sensible Guidelines. However, they'd have to address the underlying issues (in this case, that the pkgconfig files are dragging in other -devel packages). -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list