On Do April 23 2009, Tom Lane wrote: > King InuYasha <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I think this squares with my theory up-thread that it's mostly a > >>> network issue and not the database per se. It would be interesting to > >>> compare the ping times the two of you see to bugzilla.redhat.com. > > > > [ two responses, no data ] > > I take it nobody wants to sully their complaining with actual facts > that might help narrow down the problem. Here it takes around 13-15 seconds to load a Red Hat bugzilla but report. Ping is 230 ms and for one bug report, Firefox creates 20 requests which all have to do a seperate SSL handshake, because the server does not support to keep connections open or HTTP Pipelining afaict. One SSL handshake seems to take around 700 ms currently, because there are two requests that create a 404 and take that long. I did the measuring using the tamper data plugin btw. Regards Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
