On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 02:01 +0500, Suren Karapetyan wrote: > On Friday 24 April 2009 01:17:01 Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Why didn't you file a bug? If you don't report problems when you > > experience them, how do you ever expect it to get better? > > -- > > Adam Williamson > > Fedora QA Community Monkey > > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > > http://www.happyassassin.net > > This is why: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=pulseaudio&product=Fedora > There you'll find a *lot* of bugs related to pulseaudio. > And a few of them (about hogging resources and sound quality problems) > don't look like they will be fixed [soon]. > Why? Cause they are being reported since the very begining, again and again. Interesting experiment. Let's do it my way: [adamw@adam ~]$ bugzilla query -p Fedora -c pulseaudio --outputformat="%{bug_status} %{resolution}" | sort if you do that and take a look at the results...you get 372 bugs. 27 are NEW, and 6 are ASSIGNED - so only 33 open bugs. 4 are CLOSED CANTFIX, 69 are CLOSED NOTABUG, 17 CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA, 17 CLOSED WORKSFORME, 70 are CLOSED DUPLICATE - 177 that were considered and closed for probably valid reasons. And: 15 are CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE, 5 are CLOSED ERRATA, 6 are CLOSED NEXTRELEASE and 92 are CLOSED RAWHIDE - that's 118 that were fixed. 25 are CLOSED UPSTREAM. I don't see anything particularly wrong with those numbers. Obviously a lot of valid bugs have been filed and properly fixed. The amount that are currently outstanding is not at all unreasonable as a proportion of the total, and not an unmanageable number of bugs taken absolutely. I suspect you'd see very similar proportions if you looked at, say, all kernel bugs, or all X bugs. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
