Chris Adams wrote:
> I would expect "security paranoia" is in response to last year's
> incident. Things were pretty loose and easy before that, and look where
> that got Fedora.
That harmless intrusion (nothing actually got compromised in Fedora space,
all the packages in the repo verified intact and there's no evidence of any
malicious packages having been signed) got blown way out of proportion (too
long downtime, too much secrecy, ...), more paranoia is exactly the
opposite of what we need.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
