Re: security flaw in udev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 19:12 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
> On 04/22/2009 07:04 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/329266/rss
> >
> >
> 
> What is the proper procedure to update infrastructure components like udev 
> or hal without rebooting the machine? udev for example doesn't have an init 
> script.
> 
> Given the expected increased use of virtualization reboots of the host 
> machine are going to become more and more painful. This should probably be 
> taken into account when designing these component and/or packaging them.

Uhh, actually I find virtualization makes rebooting the host easier. My
server is running CentOS 5 with its previous Debian install running in a
Xen VM, that still handles most of the services. Apparently when the
host reboots, the VM is automatically hibernated, and restored on the
next boot. The VM hardly notices anything happened at all, just a
temporary lack of network connection and CPU time... :)

The more disruptive thing is, doesn't everyone's *VM*s need to be
patched and rebooted now too? :P

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux