Re: xarchiver needs binutils?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 07:30 -0400, Michal Nowak wrote:

> > > I was wondering why this change happened and of course whether we 
> > > need that dependency nowadays. I investigated a bit Debian's
> > xarchiver 
> > > page [2] and there's no requirement on binutils, nor its parts.
> > 
> > A guess would be that ar is used to unarchive one format.
> 
> Good point!
> 
> newman@dhcp-lab-124 xarchiver-0.5.2 $ grep -w ar -R -n src/*.c
> src/deb.c:31:	command = g_strconcat ("ar tv ",archive->escaped_path,NULL);
> src/deb.c:133:	command = g_strconcat ("ar x ",archive->escaped_path," ",names->str,NULL);
> src/main.c:372:	absolute_path = g_find_program_in_path("ar");
> 
> I didn't even know xarchiver supports .deb.
> 
> I wish I can see different solution than splitting binutils, if there's
> demand for getting rid of 9MB dependency from XFCE/LXDE folks.

This is an ideal case for the use of soft dependencies, of course...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux