On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 06:38 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > If you're serious about your signature, RH NDAs have to be considered > irrelevant for Fedora. > They are, however there is more going on at bugzilla.redhat.com than Fedora. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) identi.ca (http://identi.ca/jkeating)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
