On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 17:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 17:16 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 06:45 +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > > > I agree, actually. Can poorly-authenticated access to Bugzilla really > > > cause such a degree of havoc? > > > > It can leak NDA information from Red Hat partners to non-Red Hat folks, > > which could cause Red Hat to be sued. > > So, another Red Hat issue affecting Fedora. :\ I presume the enhanced > busybodying can't only be enforced on the accounts which can actually > access restricted info? Ah, I'm a little confused. All that was requested was a change of password. This doesn't stop Joe Public from signing up and accessing bugzilla, and presumably doesn't stop Joe from viewing leaky NDA's. All it seems to do is make me have to change a password. Surely if there are leaks using the old password, then there's still leaks with my new password (which is actually my old password since I went back in and changed it back). Or am I missing something ;-] R. -- MOOSE technology po box 6061, north croydon, vic 3136 mobile: 0403 338 731 http://www.moosetech.com.au phone: 03 9726 9457 mailto:rodd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx fax: 03 9726 9456 "Share your knowledge. It is a way to achieve immortality." -- The Dalai Lama -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
