Re: FOSS needs a central bug tracker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:26 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 20:45 +0200, Mark wrote:
> >
> >> OpenID is indeed a solution to one of the problems (multiple bug
> >> reporting accounts). But that would only work if:
> >> 1. All bug trackers support OpenID
> >> 2. all currently using a bug tracker update to a version that uses OpenID.
> >>
> >> >From the reply's so far i see that fedora (or the ones that did
> >> respond) would like the idea but have a hard time believing that
> >> something this massive can be done.
> >
> > So you have a hard time believing something as massive as switching to
> > OpenID can be done, but you reckon everyone switching to the One True
> > Bug Tracker should be perfectly achievable? :)
> 
> Implementing OpenID is several times a smaller task than getting
> everyone to switch to a single issue tracker.

Er, yes. That's exactly what I was saying.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux