Re: Rawhide debuginfo packages with no sources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Di April 21 2009, Adam Miller wrote:
> I fixed both ninvaders and shed, but ifstatus seems to be quite the
> pain. The makefile is lacking to say the least and I can't seem to
> figure out how to make it spit out a valid debuginfo rpm. When I got
> it reviewed, my reviewer had me make a comment in the spec about the
> fact that its makefile can't handle %{?_smp_mflags} ... is it possible
> that it just won't spit out a debuginfo?
>
> If that's not a possibility, then I would greatly appreciate some
> direction. http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus-1.1.0-3.src.rpm
> http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus.spec

The Makefile uses the default target to create .o files from .cc files. You 
can run this in the spec to get the optflags into make (or adjust the Makefile 
patch to also set CXXFLAGS to RPM_OPT_FLAGS by default):

make "CXXFLAGS=%{optflags}"

Regards
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux