On Monday 20 April 2009, Adam Miller wrote: > I was unfortunately not able to get to the packages that are mine the > other day, but I was able to start some work on them today. Here is my > question at risk of sounding like I have no clue what I'm doing: "What > process should I follow to verify that I have fixed the issue?". I > read the wiki link that was posted > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo) and did verify > that one of the packages in question (shed) had a -s in the install > section of the makefile, so I created a patch for the Makefile.in and > wanted to find a way to test the resulting package before submitting > it as a patch or a fix. Quick surface check: build the package, look at the build logs and verify that the expected $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (not only -g) are there and that there are no "install -s", "gcc -s", "ld -s", "strip" or the like in it, run rpm -qlp (or rpmls) on the debuginfo package, verify that it contains both *.debug as well as source files. The new debuginfo package should also be larger, sometimes much larger, than the non-fixed one. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
