Re: development packages and multilib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 13:29 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> > 
> > It works just fine. No way in hell is mock going to be acceptable for a
> > quick turn-around edit-compile-test cycle on a massive OpenGL app.
> 
> Supporting multilib creates untold number of disasters and unfixable
> situations.  Its just not worth it when you can maintain a chroot (mock
> or not) of the arch you wish to fiddle with.  Trying to continue to do
> it in / is just insane.

It WORKSFORME.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux