On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 06:43:10PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > This is a dilemma we have in Fedora. I have no idea why someone would > want to keep the devel subpackages of the same package with different > archs installed. For example. I have a production tool that needs to run (and therfore be tested) on both 32 and 64 bit varients of my platform (say intel or powerpc). I need both the /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 files (and therefor the packages) installed so I can compile and test locally. Sure I /could/ to the testing on the target server but I don't need (nor want) to. > Even adding a %doc makes these devel subpackages conflict each other. > I do wonder what is the logic laying behind. I agree this isn't an easy problem to solve and has been discussed many times here (and I've only been here for 6 months ;P) Yours Tony -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
