On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 16:18 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > e.g. I don't think we have many packages in Fedora that uses > /usr/local as their prefix, which is a very common upstream default. That's not a valid example. This discrepancy is exactly what the defaults are intended to preserve. The whole point is that stuff sourced from your distribution and stuff you build yourself from source code wind up in two different places so you can easily tell one from the other (and, in the worst case, wipe out /usr/local and know you're back at a stock system). This is not a useful case to argue that *all* upstream defaults shouldn't be considered in setting Fedora defaults. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
