On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 20:41 +0200, drago01 wrote: > Just guessing there was a patch that was reverted for this reason. > (iwl3945 was broken). Swing and a miss - the laptop in question is ath9k (or ath5k, I forget). :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
