On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:02:25 +0200 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Seth Vidal wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 01:37 +0500, Suren Karapetyan wrote: > >>> You will not find anyone @RH who will agree that > >>> previews behavior was better > >> > >> On the contrary, you'll likely find many people who work for Red > >> Hat that would prefer the old behavior, they're just not wasting > >> their time by arguing about it on a distribution mailing list. > > > > In a survey of 10 RH employees you will find between 10 and 40 > > different opinions. sometimes more if you don't ask some of them to > > confine their comments to a limited amount of time. > Classical situation to call "the management", let them decide and to > name "someone to be in charge/responsible". > > Unfortunately, this current FESCO has refused to decide. No. FESCo did decide not to force maintainers to revert this change. Speaking only for myself, I think such micro-management sets a bad precedent and should be avoided except in extraordinary situations, which I don't think this is. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
