On Friday, April 17 2009, Till Maas said: > On Fr April 17 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said: > > > Think for example something weird like /usr on fuse, do we want to > > > support that? Note that given the infinite amount of possibilities it is > > > probably the best to only describe what we do support. > > > > IMO, no. (Nor root on fuse, which could I'm sure conceivably be hacked in.) > > Allowing root on fuse might be useful for live images, that then maybe could > use funionfs instead of the lvm snapshot. 1) The live images are a pretty special beast and thus wouldn't be influenced by any decision of fuse vs no fuse for /usr 2) fuse based unionfs suffers from a lot of the same problems as non-fuse based. Luckily, Val's work on union mounts seems to be progressing pretty well although I'm not 100% sure what the time frame on that is right now Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
