Re: Profiling X, KDE, KWin and friends...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi,

Do I have to install the -debuginfo equivalent of the packages I intend to profile? Were the -release packages already compiled with -O2 -g flags so that we already have the necessary debugging information embedded into the code? Or is it just some core libraries (like pthread) that it would be nice to have their symbols in a core dump?

What about X? On the sysprof website, it's mentioned that it has to be recompiled from source and to avoid the generation of static modules.. Is it the case for the X server shipped with Fedora?

Regards,
Ilyes Gouta.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Ilyes Gouta <ilyes.gouta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Alright, thank you guys for the information. I'm gonna try sysprof out, it
> looks like it's THE tool I'm looking for!

Has anyone compared sysprof with oprofile?  I'm going to need a system
profiler Real Soon Now, and I'm wondering how they compare to each
other.
--
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/

--

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux