Re: My first DontZap use case while testing F11 beta

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Christopher Stone
<chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 18:14 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

We aren't whining.

We are fiercely fighting to prevent serious harm to Fedora's usability.
Oh, come on, quit exaggerating. This is a pretty trivial issue. Grow a
sense of perspective.

Why do people at redhat and/or x.org seem to think the zap feature is
trivial or unimportant or not useful?
Probably the fact it's not being used "when things just work" and is only _necessary_ in situations of emergency/"when thinks go bizarre"

"Infrequently used" == "unnecessary"?

Some food for thought: How to quit X when X comes up but the window-manager fails to come up?

In recent days, this has happened several times to me on FC10 (reason yet unknown, probably somebody having messed up something related to nis/yp, nfs, autofs). My escape: ctl-alt-bs.

Ralf

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux