Re: rpms/proftpd/devel proftpd.spec,1.45,1.46

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seth Vidal wrote:


On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Tom Lane wrote:

Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Matthias Saou wrote:
+# We'll need to find a better way to do this once RHEL6 comes out

A "better way" that I use is:
BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h
Works everywhere.

I think this is discouraged by guidelines because it makes the depsolver
work *much* harder to figure out which package the require actually
resolves as.  At least I know I've been told to avoid it when practical.

Of course, maybe fixing that is just a small performance fix in rpm ...


It doesn't make the depsolver work harder. It makes the user/builder download all the filelists metadata to do this look up - so it is a pain for users on slow/bad connections.

It's not a problem in this case though because it's a buildreq that's resolved once on the buildsystem and has no impact on end users at all.

Paul.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux