> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 23:15 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > Some contacts had got duplicated for some reason, but still, nice effort. > > > > Unfortunately, as I've been told, duplication of data is an inherent issue > > with libopensync 0.22, and the main reason why they're working on > > redesigning everything in 0.3x/0.40. Unfortunately, their redesign is > > breaking everything at the moment. :-( > > Yes, but it's more of a long-term issue (or if you get an incomplete > sync - the problem is a 'slow sync' duplicates data). I wouldn't expect > it as a matter of course on a single-shot test sync. As I said, though, > it could actually have been duplicated prior to the sync, I didn't think > to check. I'll do some more extensive testing with various devices in a > bit. and create duplicates¹. I don't think any user would want that. - opensync 0.2x cannot detect² the SAME/SIMILAR cases reliably. - Thus only because of these two issues, (plus hundred two smaller ones) opensync 0.2x is broken, by design, inside the core - regardless of plugins. - It's useless to ship completely broken (not low Quality, broken) software. - Fedora 11 will ship them anyway. http://www.opensync.org/wiki/trunk/features/mergerCapabilities http://opensync.org/wiki/trunk/features/mergerFormatConversion ² http://www.opensync.org/ticket/883 > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net -- Varo hattupäisiä autoilijoita. |
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
