Paul wrote: > Hi, > > As it stands, the f11 release will not contain a ppc/ppc64 version of > mono due to a continued build issue. > As discussed earlier on this list, the worst that should happen is we release with mono-2.4-9.RC1.fc11 which builds on ppc/ppc64. > As a compromise, would it be acceptible to download the latest svn > tarball, do a complete diff and patch in the diff file and then release > it but not with the svn attribute? (assuming it will build on the ppc > machines). > > Failing that, should I just build mono from svn and check that in today > as a chain build? Time is short - it's my birthday today, I've also got > my kids for it (first time in 2 years), so a quick reply would help. > It sounds like mono's svn snapshot won't build on ppc any more than current release + patches from the bug. So taking a snapshot seems unnecessary. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
