Phil, > i can see no > reason not to use this dual format for live releases, and if you think that > because tools are available to use the existing method is a valid reason not > to move forward with other more useful methods then i don't know what to say > :-/ The iso is less useful than the existing method. The existing tools can perform all sorts of checks, whereas dd is open to mis-use. The existing tools are non-destructive so I can have a load of general purpose info (eg. Windows / Linux diagnostic tools and important data files (ssh or WPA keys). The USB disk remains cross-platform readable. I could do all this with the iso but would have to put multiple partitions on the device, and it starts to get more complex... I think the only way the existing tools could be improved is perhaps a GUI version and the ability to have several images on one disk and a boot menu to select between them. -Cam -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
