On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > Quite a few packages that produce *-debuginfo without sources have crept again > in rawhide. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo for > possible reasons, the most usual of which in my (past, haven't checked this > batch that closely) experience is failure to honor $RPM_OPT_FLAGS during build > which can also mean that the default security related compiler flags aren't > being applied either. > > List of such packages identified by my debuginfo-check.py is attached > (ownership info generated with Thorsten's fedoradev-pkgowners). I intend to > submit debuginfo-check.py to yum-utils (probably as debugrepo-check) and have > added a similar check in upstream svn rpmlint, hopefully with these additions > people will start noticing the issues easier. > > Maintainer Package Co-maintainers > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > mbooth brazil (none) This is a Java package that is AOT compiled for GCJ so the RPM flags are beyond my control. Compilation is done by the aot-compile-rpm script from the java-1.5.0-gcj-devel package. What do I need to do (if anything)? -- Mat Booth www.matbooth.co.uk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
