On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:37:31 -0500 Adam Miller <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I should have sent out an update on this, just didn't think about it. > > Kevin Fenzi composed an unofficial incremental image that I've been > fortunate enough to get a hold of and do some testing, the issues have > actually already been fixed in rawhide. I composed a new unofficial > incremental image myself yesterday, it is available here: > http://www.shsu.edu/~ajm023/fedora-xfce-20090407.iso > > sha1sum fedora-xfce-20090407.iso > a9a20f943e7dfa22300478cde1cf86e6ca9dcef5 fedora-xfce-20090407.iso > > My image is *completely* unofficial but was put together using the > xfce spin kickstart from the git repository. Anyone who would like to > download it for testing is welcome to, I'll probably leave it up for > download for at least a week. Yeah, I meant to post here too, but I guess i only posted on the thread on test-list. ;( (The dangers of multiple lists having the same discussion). http://mirrors.tummy.com/pub/tmp/Fedora-xfce-20090404-i686.iso Is my unoffical compose using the official git kickstart. I have been unable to figure out what went wrong with the i686 beta. ;( I have asked rel-eng to do a snapshot this week and I will be testing that as soon as it exists. > > -Adam > kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
