2009/4/5 Paul <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Agreed but as always, patches are welcome and if not to assist package maintainers like yourself with issues like this I can't think of a more perfect use for our arch teams. The wiki has documentation on the correct way to leverage these fine peoples expertise btw.
- David
Looks like I'll have to do that then - not the best solution though :-(Hi,
>
> > I don't know about the concrete plans of the Mono team, but
> I think they
> > wont go for it in Fedora 10 because 11 releases in less than
> two months.
>
> MD 2.0 is out there for rawhide with 1.9.1 being looked at for
> f10
> updates testing.
>
> 2.4 is a sticking point as it's constantly falling over on
> koji for ppc
> builds. It's been reported upstream, but nothing much is
> happening over
> on that :-(
>
> You could block it on PPC and file a bug which our talented the PPC
> arch team can help you resolve. I don't assume you have hardware to
> test or knowledge about the platform to solve the problem so it seems
> like an acceptable bandaid for Fedora here and now.
Agreed but as always, patches are welcome and if not to assist package maintainers like yourself with issues like this I can't think of a more perfect use for our arch teams. The wiki has documentation on the correct way to leverage these fine peoples expertise btw.
- David
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
