> > ... Really what I have in mind here is stuff like "Video playback locks > up the machine", "OpenGL locks up the machine", "Second Life hangs the X > server", "World of Warcraft crashes the X server", "This web site > crashes the X server", "Rosegarden crashes the X server". All of which > are entirely automateable, though the "hard locks the machine" cases > will require some sort of hardware watchdog arrangement... > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441665 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474973 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474977 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487432 > > At any rate, *some* testing is way better than none at all. Sounds reasonable, but how do you turn SMOLT profiles into real test machines? In the worst case you will end up building one test server for every single bug. Without proper hardware virtualization (which we will not see for the next 10-20 years) that testing thing would be more expensive than just sending certified hardware to every user for free ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
