James Ralston wrote: > I intend to start filing bugs against anything I can find that doesn't > use fallocate(), yes. But I needed a better implementation to suggest > than posix_fallocate(). Cool. Feel free to cc: me on them? FWIW transmission already can do it though it requires some undocumented(?) configuration. It also gives you the choice of posix_fallocate(), or not. It'd be nice if you could say "fallocate if you've got it; but no posix_fallocate, thanks" -Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
