Re: rpms/transifex/F-9 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.6, 1.7 transifex.spec, 1.6, 1.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 15:57 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed,  1 Apr 2009 13:13:39 +0000 (UTC), Ignacio wrote:
> 
> > Author: ivazquez
> > 
> > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/transifex/F-9
> 
> > Log Message:
> > - Upstream update
> >   * Fixed ordering of components untranslated by a Release X Lang
> >   * Fixed missing parameter for the set_stats_for_lang method call
> >   * Fixed msgfmt to work large files
> > - Fixed small bug in %%post
> > - Fixed PROJECT_PATH in the settings
> 
> > -Requires:   intltool >= 0.40.5
> > +Requires:   intltool >= 0.37.1
> 
> What is the full story here which would explain why the minimum version
> was too high for F-9? And what is really the lowest support version?
> FWIW, the spec included in the tarball still requires >= 0.40.5

It was a guess based on the fact that the EL5 intltool is too old, and
it worked with the F10 intltool. I have verified that it works with the
F9 intltool and have adjusted the spec file in Fedora cvs accordingly.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux