On Friday 27 March 2009 18:22:14 Gerry Reno wrote: > This is a big deal because now some tiny minority has lobbied for > changes to X that end up affecting a large community. And the bogus > arguments about user getting confused about keys is just that totally > bogus. I've never had a user complain about X control key > combinations. Emacs users complain because Emacs wants to have the same > key control sequences as Xorg. That's just wrong. And as a sys admin > if you're not willing to stand up and say that's wrong, then watch for > more ridiculous changes coming your way in the future. > ... > There shouldn't even need to be a fight. It's a totally ridiculous > change based on bogus arguments to begin with. > I agree with most of your arguments. If the change were to completely remove support for my desired behavior, I would also complain. Since it is just a change to the default behavior, and I can easily recover my preferred behavior, I will accept the change and wish those who care more strongly the best of luck. "I support and oppose many things, but not strongly enough to pick up a pen." - Bender, Futurama -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ All messages cryptographically signed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
