On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 15:38 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 13:49 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> I'll ask my question a different way I guess: > >> > >> Why does pm-utils/NM bring down the network for hibernate/suspend? > > > > Must have missed something here... > > > > Are you referring to the periodic problem where "Networking Enabled" is > > unchecked on resume? If so, that's covered by a pm-utils bug already, > > which is really a dbus bug that can be worked around in pm-utils. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477964 > > > > If you're referring in general to "why does NM bring down the network" > > on suspend, there are a few reasons for that which I can elaborate on. > > Well, the problem I'm seeing on a machine with NFS home directories and > LDAP authentication is that after the network is brought down calls by > pm-utils to sync hang (presumably NFS related) and I see lots of > nss_ldap cannont connect to LDAP server errors and the hibernate process > hangs. > > I suppose I should file a bug - against pm-utils for incorrect ordering > of scripts? Should I expect this to work? Yeah, should probably get re-ordered. NM is at 55, should probably be one of the last things to get poked. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
