Re: A supposedly patent-free suggestion/solution to the curious subpixel rendering in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/27/2009 02:25 PM, Jud Craft wrote:
2009/3/27 Callum Lerwick<seg@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Note that a FreeType developer is not so convinced that SubLCD is
completely in the clear:

http://david.freetype.org/cleartype-patents.htm

That is very interesting.  I would be curious to hear his opinion on
Qt's method.  Patents are so very...complicated.

The subject of this thread is FALSE. I wonder whether the person starting the thread even read the page he quoted. All the Qt page is saying is that they now implement all the different subpixel filters that FreeType supports (in a patent-infringing build). There is NO new algorithm involved. Go read it for yourself:

  http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2008/09/01/subpixel-antialiasing-on-x11/

To quote: "Note that the filtering we use in Qt 4.4 and earlier is pretty much the same as Freetype’s default filtering, but unlike before we now also support the other filtering settings."

Any kind of subpixel filtering is covered by those patents.  Just stop it already.

behdad
Your pissed off text stack maintainer

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux