Greg KH (greg@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > The problem is more or less this: > > > > - Without a new device naming standard that offers persistent names, > > what really does it gain you? > > I know, and I agree. Well, I like my pretty, tiny /dev tree, but that's > just me :) > > And I'm trying to move toward getting such a standard, but the people > who are supposed to be taking the next step, seem to have disappeared > again. > > Time to go kick some DCL[1] members around again... Well, I'm not sure that the need for new, persistent, device names is necessarily driven by DCL requirements (or CGL, for that matter.) But that's a different issue. :) Bill
