On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:00:05PM +0800, Stephan February wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:38 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:39:14PM +0800, Stephan February wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > I have done extensive reading on the Fedora site regarding packaging, > > > and specifically "code vs. content". > > > My employer is developing a web-application which will be licensed under > > > GPL or similar FSF-approved license. The web application will most > > > likely contain a proprietary (non-free) flash charting widget. > > > Will our rpm-packaged web application, which will include the flash > > > widget be accepted into Fedora repository ? > > > > The flash widget would have to be excluded, or made open source & buildable > > with open source tools too. > > > > Does this mean that if I were to use something like OpenFlash Chart, > which is LGPL (http://teethgrinder.co.uk/open-flash-chart-2/) and > buildable using the MPL-licensed Adobe Flex SDK, that I could get the > Webapp + OpenFlashChart .rpm into the repo ? Last time I looked at the Adobe Flex SDK there was some questionmark about whether all of it was truely covered under MPL - some files had unclear licensing headers in the source. But assuming those were resolved & Adobe Flex SDK were approved for Fedora, then using OpenFlash Chart seems like a reasonable approach. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
