----- "Bill Nottingham" <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Matthew Woehlke (mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> Matthew Woehlke (mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > >>> How is having a tool to generate sane xorg.conf's "wrong"? > >> > >> Xorg -configure > > > > ...which doesn't clean up existing xorg.conf and doesn't have the > > helpful 'you need to be root' dialog (and doesn't let you make even > > > basic changes in a GUI)? How is that better? > > It's a tool that generates a sane xorg.conf. If that is the goal, > I think it's a better place to start than with a large > barely-maintained > graphical framework. Exactly what I think about it. Better to start from clean ground. When someone needs custom xorg.conf, he must know what he's doing so tool that does nothing (only generating template) is useless. Jaroslav > Bill > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
