Huge development kernel rpms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Huge development kernel rpms
From: "Sean Estabrooks" <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:28:10 -0400 (EDT)
Importance: Normal
List-archive: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1

Anyone else notice that the binary development kernel RPMs are about 10
times bigger today (almost 100Mb each)?   Looks like none of the files are
stripped.  Was this intentional or just a hiccup in the build process?

Sean

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Huge development kernel rpms
  - From: Alan Cox

Prev by Date: Fedora Core 2 Update: GConf2-2.6.0-7
Next by Date: Re: Fedora Core 3
Previous by thread: Fedora Core 2 Update: GConf2-2.6.0-7
Next by thread: Re: Huge development kernel rpms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux