Re: Full Licence field

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:07:30AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Basically, have rpm -V ignore timestamp verification on %license files.
Make that "have rpm -V ignore timestamp verification on files whose hardlink count is > 1". That's reasonably in line with how rpm -V currently treats files shared among multiple packages and makes hardlink-on-content verification-friendly for any files, and without making licenses a totally oddball special case in verify.

gcc contains hardlinks (e.g. /usr/bin/{,x86_64-redhat-linux-}gcc) and for
these I'd prefer if the timestamp verification was done.
What for?

You seem to be forgetting that files system are not read-only. Any user has the liberty to "move/copy" around files or "touch" them.

What you really want is "identical contents", not matching timestamps.

Ralf

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux