On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Wrong, that will lead to overlinking which is exactly what the > Requires.private original behaviour tend to avoid. Well, something is definitely broken if the behavior changes in an undesirable way if more packages are installed than are specified in the BuildRequires. > The problem is that the current Requires.private behaviour is conter > intuitive and the best solution would be to move some of the > Requires.private to their Libs.private : equivalent as a workaround. Ok, well that raises the question why the problem doesn't appear in F-10 and later, if F-9 has the same version of pkg-config. Anyways if that's the fix, it needs to be done upstream. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
