>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating writes: JK> On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 06:32 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: >> one small problem in the %files section, then it should work. Either >> way, can we open up the ACLs in the meantime? JK> Have you started the nonresponsive maintainer process, or otherwise JK> contacted the maintainer's sponsor in order to get an idea what's going JK> on? I have, on multiple occasions, tried to contact the maintainer, Cristian Balint. Looking at the FAS2 site, it appears that, you (Jesse Keating) are his sponsor (btw, it took me a while to figure out how to find out that info, it is not obvious how to do it from the FAS2 webpage). The maintainer has sometimes updated the packages, but not in response to any requests, and has not (in the last 3-4 months) responded directly to any questions about the ACLs or broken deps. Here is the log of activity required for the non-responsive maintainer policy: 1) First attempt at contact: on 2009-01-17 by Nicolas Mailhot to fix mapnik package: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480461 No response. 2) Second attempt: on 2009-03-04 Dan Horák requested maintainer respond to broken deps: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488490#c0 No response. 2) Third attempt: on 2009-03-14, I also reiterated request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488490#c2 No response. Fourth attempt: on 2009-03-20, I attempted another contact: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488490#c3 No response as yet. 4) In several threads on fedora-devel-list I have asked about opening up these ACLs, which implicitly includes a question about how to contact the maintainer: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg00214.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg00281.html (and I have also asked on #fedora-devel) I have also sent private mail to rezso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, regarding openin up ACLs, as early as 2009-01-05, to no response. So at this point, I believe we should be at step (4) on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers in which many reasonable attempts to contact the maintainer have been made. If the above f-d-l posts aren't sufficient, consider this request as the one that asks if anybody knows how to contact the maintainer. In general it appears that even a sponsor may not be able to fix the issues any case, because of the ACLs, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibities#Fix_issues_caused_by_sponsored_maintainers However, in this case, I assume that Jesse has the appropriate privileges to do this. Actually, I don't really care if the ACLs are opened immediately (although they should eventually be), just that *somebody* with cvsadmin privileges in the meantime rebuild the packages to fix the deps. I will continue to supply patches on the above bug until it builds, and hopefully somebody will apply them and rebuild. (As an aside: surely the obvious fact of broken deps in Beta should pre-empt or otherwise short-circuit the lengthy and somewhat cumbersome non-maintainer process to open up ACLs or have a cvsadmin person apply fix.) Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
