Re: getting rid of gcc34

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler wrote:
Denis Leroy wrote:
Please no, these older versions of gcc are extremely useful to C++
programmers. The differences between one version of gcc to the other
often have a significant impact over C++ code compatibility (much more
so than for C). I spent a lot of time trying to fix a K-3D build issue
related to the C++ boost library unhappy with g++ 4.4. It was very
useful to have g++34 available to fall back on a working case.

What's the status of that? It's one of the remaining broken dependencies in
the F11 beta.

It's a particularly tough C++ compilation issue, I could use some help if anyone is familiar with C++ template meta-programming (Boost MPL). K-3D ships its own version of the Boost GIL library (Image library). It's fairly straightforward to patch the source to use the Boost GIL library we ship with F-11, but unfortunately it doesn't fix the problem.

Looking at the g++ changelog from 4.3 to 4.4, I don't see anything that could explain this problem (code compiles fine with 4.3).

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=93629

See also:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491322

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=49B7887D.8020502%40poolshark.org&forum_name=k3d-development

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux