Re: Should bluez be in base, or split deps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:45 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> bluez requires dbus-bluez-pin-helper which pulls in one of the following 
> desktop environment packages:
> 
> # repoquery --whatprovides dbus-bluez-pin-helper
> gnome-bluetooth-0:2.27.1-4.fc11.x86_64
> bluez-gnome-0:1.8-16.fc11.x86_64
> kdebluetooth-1:0.3-3.fc11.x86_64
> 
> I think @base should be limited to non-gui packages.
> 
> Perhaps a bluez-desktop package to pull in dbus-bluez-pin-helper?
<snip>

It's not a "desktop" thing, it's a "make Bluetooth do something" thing.
If you can't pair (or at least connect and trust), you can't use the
device, simple as that.

Write a command-line version of it, and I'm sure we'll find a place for
it.

> Funny that kdebluetooth wins over bluez-gnome.  I thought shortest wins, 
> or is this an epoch thing?

Cheers

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux