Re: Orphaning Sylpheed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:12:35 -0700, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:36 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Samstag, den 14.03.2009, 19:40 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:

> > > As I'd like to discontinue with packaging the Sylpheed E-Mail Client
> > > for Fedora, I've dropped ownership, so somebody else may take over.
> > 
> > I use it and I need it for my LXDE Spin, so I'm going to co-maintain it
> > together with Itamar.
> 
> Just out of interest - is there much reason to prefer Sylpheed over
> Claws any more? Is it lighter on resources, for e.g.? Just curious,
> really.

I switched to Claws because I wanted Xft2, and went back to Sylpheed
just as soon as the mainline acquired Xft2. It crashes too much.
If I wanted another bloated MUA with unchecked hunger for features,
I would be using Evo.

-- Pete

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux