> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Manuel Wolfshant >> Hello >> >> What's the proper procedure of asking for opening the ACLs of gdal and >> related packages (so that the provenpackager group could fix them) ? The +1 to getting a decision on this and opening up these ACLs! >>>>> "JS" == Jon Stanley writes: JS> I'm not sure we (FESCo) ever reached a decision on this. I'll add that JS> (very old) ticket to the meeting agenda for this week. I think that JS> what we were leaning towards is a retroactive review of everything JS> that wasn't open. With the recent provenpackager reseed, it's probably JS> time to take it up again. JS> Thanks for the reminder! Is there a link to that ticket? Couldn't find one on https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/3 The particular maintainer in question FAS name is "rezso" and I have tried repeated attempts to contact him, and although he has built some of the packages during the times attempted communication, he has not responded directly to e-mail or to requests in bugs to either explain or open up the ACLs. I suspect that he is not deliberately excluding people, but probably doesn't think it's a priority to respond to or fix the ACLs. I would be happy if FESCo could just have someone with access to pkgdb to simply enable the "provenpackager" on the rawhide branches packages currently locked out of provenpackager. That would be enough to get the ball rolling on fixing the packages. Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
