On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:41 -0400, Michel Salim wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Are Ted's patches, that are queued up for 2.6.30, going to be applied to > >> F-11 (and F-10) 2.6.29 kernels or not? Asking just out of curiosity. > > > > I sure hope they will. This is pretty much a blocker for the KDE spin. > > > Is there any design document about how KDE persists configuration > files? I have noticed application crashes affecting recently-applied > KDE settings in the past, even on ext3, while GConf settings seem to > be persisted to disk almost immediately. Is KDE Doing It Wrong? https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781/comments/54 rename() is what I mean by atomic filesystem operations.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
