Re: Please fix your bugs in release instead of rawhide! (Part 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I'm sure there are other examples one can find, but I do not
understand why the bugs should be fixed in release instead of rawhide.
It would be certainly good to fix bugs in stable releases but why
shouldn't they be fixed in rawhide at the same time?

I don't think anyone is saying stuff shouldn't be fixed in rawhide when it makes sense to do so*, just that some stuff should be fixed in release /also/.

(* e.g. rawhide isn't a totally different code base, which can happen some times.)

--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
Microsoft has become the next IBM; a dinosaur struggling to survive in the age of more able-to-adapt mammals (FLOSS). It remains to be seen if they'll be able to adapt before they go extinct.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux