Re: Deltarpm *not* ready for new RPM checksums (was Re: Ready for new RPM version?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:52:32PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 19:41 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > Ok, I've been trying this, but how can we tell if the sequence is sha256
> > or md5 if we're *just* given the sequence (i.e. applydeltarpm -c -s
> > audit-libs-1.7.12-1.fc11-04548395de7d18795d88b32ea98897e90140 where it's
> > a sha256 sequence)?
> 
> Ok, I've got it.  We just check against md5 first, then sha256 if md5
> doesn't match.  It's not elegant, but it should work fine, especially
> since we're only checking for verification, *not* security.

That would also work, of course, it'll take some extra time though.
But see my other mail.

Cheers,
  Michael.

-- 
Michael Schroeder                                   mls@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux