Re: F-10 updates repo signed with wrong key?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:28:02AM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:38 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:35:00PM +0000, Chris Eveleigh wrote:
>> >On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:30 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> >> warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4ebfc273
>> >> updates/gpgkey                                                | 2.3 kB 
>> >>     00:00
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Public key for NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.0.99-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm is not 
>> >> installed
>> >> 
>> >> The key:
>> >> 
>> >> gpg-pubkey-4ebfc273-48b5dbf3 --> gpg(Fedora (10)
>> >> <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
>> >> 
>> >> does appear to be installed.
>> 
>> The issue has been found and is in the process of being fixed.
>> 
>> >i've raised a bug for this:
>> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489506 (but only a few
>> >minutes ago)
>> 
>> I'll let the NM maintainer deal with the bug, but problems with
>> package signatures should be reported in the releng trac instance,
>> not the package bugzilla.
>
>Just a heads up, similar error in Fedora 9 today
>(NetworkManager-0.7.0.99-3.fc9.i386). 

Yep, known.  Already fixing that too.  Thanks for the head up though!

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux