On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 09:52 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I thought Mamoru had it correct, and the bug was in the spec: it > declared noarch but used %_libdir, which is not valid and makes no > sense, %_libdir being inherently arch-dependent. A counter-argument to this that I can think of is Java bytecode. It's architecture-independent but an architecture-dependent package is required to produce it. It's the same situation here: the Eclipse SDK has some architecture-dependent bits (most notably SWT, the graphical toolkit) and is thus arch-dependent yet the package in question (EMF) is pure bytecode and is thus architecture-independent. One solution I can think of is to make the 'eclipse' SRPM create arch-dependent RPMs for the arch-dependent bits and make its other RPMs noarch. This was only recently possible with Fedora's rpm package. Andrew -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
