-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Poelstra wrote: > To increase our chances of a successful and solid Fedora 11 release, all > new features should now be significantly complete and in a "testable" > condition. > > We need the help of a few remaining feature owners to bring their pages > current or target them for Fedora 12. > > According to a review of all the feature pages, the following features > have not been updated recently or are not 100% complete. They need to > be updated by the end of tomorrow (2009-03-05). > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/20SecondStartup > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Archer > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ArchitectureSupport > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/CrashCatcher > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Empathy > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Firefox_3.1 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/gcc4.4 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GFS2Stable > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/IBus > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KVM_PCI_Device_Assignment > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/liblvm > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MinimalPlatform > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NouveauAsDefault > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NouveauModesetting > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SSSD > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SVirt_Mandatory_Access_Control > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EFI > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/VirtVNCAuth > > If you believe your feature is substantially complete and testable state > for Fedora 11, please perform the following: > 1) Update the % complete and "last updated" date > 2) In the status section please also include what remains to be > completed including your realistic assessment as to whether it is > possible to complete by Final Feature Freeze on 2009-04-14. > > I will be sending a list features with no update to FESCo tomorrow > evening to be reviewed at their 2009-03-06 meeting. At that meeting I > will recommend that feature pages which are not current be dropped from > the Fedora 11 feature list-- > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/FeatureList > > If you believe your feature is not ready for Fedora 11, that is okay :) > Fedora 12 is only a few short months away. If you would like to target > your feature for Fedora 12, please change the page category to > "Cateogory:FeatureReadyForWranger". > > If your feature will not be ready for Fedora 11 and you aren't sure what > is going to happen to it: > 1) Please change the category of your page to > Category:FeaturePageIncomplete > 2) Remove Fedora 11 as the targeted release. > > I have a watch on all the feature pages. > > Thank you for your help, > John > > p.s. this is a follow-up message to: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-February/msg00022.html > > p.s.s individual feature owners have also been bcc on this email > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-devel-announce mailing list > Fedora-devel-announce@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce > The SSSD is listed as not having 100% completion but we noted that we fully expect to be feature-complete and testable by the Beta Freeze on March 10th. Is this insufficient? - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmu3NEACgkQeiVVYja6o6NWbQCfQbxmHc+G/qqGRwJeYEHrImeU cRwAn2+JCTnuFh0ZVfJyvlcpSHDAzC09 =jSez -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
